Startseite › Foren › Diskussionsforum “Schreiblehrkonzepte an Hochschulen” › Discussion – Keynote-Paper “The Evolution of WAC and SoTL” › Antwort auf: Discussion – Keynote-Paper “The Evolution of WAC and SoTL”
General comment to Peter and Pauls paper: FIRST – thank you! My question is: Could SoTL also profit from WAC by thinking more about ways of writing SoTL papers? To write these papers is extremely demanding. One notorious problem to succintly describe the teaching context and the goals. The information is so specific and often loaded with local vocabulary (platforms, modules, etc.) that readers easily get lost. Then: Since SoTL is open to so much disciplinary variation and styles, there is (is there?) a lack of common language generally. Also the structures of text vary. This can all be interpreted as wonderful diversity and richness and it is. At the same time, it is easy to get lost in details. At least that was something I observed reading the papers on this site.